When transcription joins the rest of the work.

If you’ve had a meeting with me in the past three years, you know I’ve been accompanied by a small army of assistants taking notes for me.

The foundation for those notes is, naturally, getting the best possible transcription: a written record of what’s said in the meeting. So quality itself is something I’ve evaluated thoroughly and continuously. But integrations have also become increasingly important, so the transcript can work sensibly with the rest of my tools. That’s why I’ve recently had two favourites in the toolbox: Klang for the best transcription, and CircleBack for the best integration.

But as of just now, I no longer have to choose. Klang now supports MCP, and this is truly a happy day in my life. (I’m not joking!)

Two things I’d like to offer:

- I’ve attached a compilation of several of the evaluations I’ve done. There’s more if you’re curious about anything in particular. (Comparisons with Sana, Teams, etc., for example.)

- Give me a shout if you’d like us to set up a live session where I show how Klang has become an integrated part of what I call my JJ OS: the system supporting me from an enquiry to a proposal, preparation, delivery, feedback, evaluation and constant learning. It’s made me work more than I ever have, while NEVER having had as much fun as I’m having now. What a time to be alive.

(I’ll keep using another tool as backup, because transcription has become that important to me, but Klang is definitely my first choice from now on. And I’d have said that even if I weren’t an enthusiastic investor in one of Sweden’s sharpest AI companies ;)