I want my sources, services and tools to come to an interface that fits how I think and work. Moving between products should not mean starting the explanation of my life and my task from zero every time.
That can involve text, voice, images, files, APIs or MCP. The important question is whether the person gains continuity and practical agency.
There are real design questions here. A convenient interface can hide disagreement between sources, conceal the context of an action or make it harder to see what actually happened.
This is a working thesis and a research question. A conversational interface that suits me is not automatically the right interface for everyone.
Put it to work
Keep context useful
Preserve continuity across tasks and devices without making the person repeat everything.
Keep sources reachable
Let people inspect the original material and notice when accounts disagree.
Keep actions legible
Distinguish suggestions, authorization, attempts and completed actions.
Keep choice real
Make it possible to correct, replace or leave the interpreting layer.
Where this comes from
JJ's chosen-interface thesis, expressed in 2026. The design questions are an AI + JJ working interpretation, not a claim of legal sovereignty or universal accessibility.
Editorial explanation · AI + JJ